CF63 or CF64?
Two neighbouring postcode districts compared on sold prices, energy, flood risk, crime and deprivation, all from the same official sources as every report on this site.
- Homes sell for about 57% less in CF63 than in CF64.
- CF64 recorded fewer crimes in the same period, though busier places always record more.
- The most recent EPC we hold is C in CF63 and D in CF64.
|
CF63
Vale of Glamorgan
|
CF64
Vale of Glamorgan
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Median home sale nearby | £166,000
from 161 sales |
£385,000
from 98 sales |
| Average sold price | £84,150 | £169,527 |
| Area price growth (YoY) | +3.3% (Vale of Glamorgan) | +3.3% (Vale of Glamorgan) |
| Dwelling type | Mid-terrace house | Mid-terrace house |
| Floor area | 107 m² | 78 m² |
| Built | 1950–1966 | 1950–1966 |
| Energy rating | C | D |
| Heating cost (EPC est.) | £1134/yr | £905/yr |
| Flood zone | Zone 1 (low probability) | Zone 1 (low probability) |
| Crime nearby | 327 recorded | 107 recorded |
| Deprivation decile | — | — |
Common questions
Is CF63 or CF64 cheaper?
CF63 is the cheaper of the two. Homes around CF63 sell for about £166,000 and around CF64 for about £385,000, from HM Land Registry records of what actually changed hands.
Which has less crime, CF63 or CF64?
CF64 recorded fewer crimes in the same period (327 in CF63 against 107 in CF64, Police.uk). Busier places record more, so read this alongside how built-up each area is rather than on its own.
Should I buy in CF63 or CF64?
That depends on what you need, and no dataset answers it. What this page gives you is the evidence side by side: what homes actually sell for, the energy ratings, the flood zone, recorded crime and deprivation, each traced to the body that published it.
A quick side-by-side snapshot only. Open each property's full report for the complete picture.